Debate Continues Over Fluoridation

Many people take for granted the addition of fluoride into public drinking water systems that aims to  prevent tooth decay. It’s a  seven-decade-old public health effort. But it’s not nearly as universally accepted.

At least seven cities or towns across the country debated it just this summer.

For example,  Wellington in Palm Beach County decided to add fluoride back into the water in July after the city council voted two years ago to remove it. In  Healdsburg, Calif., voters will revisit a ballot question in November regarding whether to stop adding the mineral to the water supply.

The debate started well before 1945 when Grand Rapids, Mich., became the first U.S. city to add fluoride to its water supply. In the decades since, opposition usually stems from studies linking fluoride intake by children with lower IQs, higher rates of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and potential toxicity.

Still, fluoridation has become a fairly common practice, with about 74 percent of the population receiving fluoridated water from community water systems, according to the  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the intervention, which is considered by the CDC to be one of the 10 top public health achievements of the 20th century and backed by the American Dental Association and the World Health Organization, also continues to raise grass roots concerns.

These  range from casting fluoride as unnecessary and ineffective to efforts to paint the mineral as “mass medication” and a “damaging environmental pollutant.”

“Fluoridation is not safe or cost-effective,” said Bill Osmunson, director of the Fluoride Action Network, a national organization against fluoridation of water supplies, adding that people should be given the freedom of choice so they can avoid ingesting excess fluoride.

In Wellington, Mayor  Anne Gerwig often fields angry emails on this issue.

“I watch the videos that they email me, I read the information they send me,” Gerwig said. Gerwig has no background in science, but she read studies and fact-checked the claims being made by the town’s residents. Gerwig said she decided to support fluoridation after she found scientific consensus about the benefits of fluoridation in preventing tooth decay.

The CDC, for instance,  considers water fluoridation to be the most cost-effective method of delivering fluoride to all, reducing tooth decay by 25 percent in children and adults. Tooth decay is still one of the most common chronic conditions among children.

But some question the need for continued fluoridation, especially as products such as toothpaste and rinses containing fluoride are available, and because the chemical’s levels vary and indications of harm are not always clear.

Philippe Grandjean, an adjunct professor at Harvard University School of Public Health, has authored a  couple of studies questioning the need for the added fluoride.

“Our dental health is clearly much less dependent on fluoride in drinking water than way back when this important public health intervention was initiated,” Grandjean said.

In a 2016  Harvard Public Health article, Grandjean commented about the need for more research about populations that may be vulnerable to the mineral and the proper dose of it in drinking water. In response, the article drew multiple critical  letters.

“The article misrepresents the current state of the science of community water fluoridation, and does not provide a fair and balanced perspective,” wrote Francis Kim and Scott L. Tomar from the American Association of Public Health Dentistry and Bruce Donoff, dean of the Harvard School of Dental Medicine in  one of the letters.

New studies are published almost every year that bring up concerns about fluoridation in drinking water, linking the intake with various  developmental  issues and even  thyroid problems, issues that Osmunson also brought up. Weno and Levy said those studies were performed in places where natural fluoride levels are higher and where residents may get fluoride through milk or salt rather than water. Excessive fluoride intake does have health implications —  a problem commonly found in places with high concentrations of natural fluoride such as China, India and Africa.  Most Americans receive water with low natural levels of fluoride.

But other towns continue to wrestle with the issue. In July, the commissioners of  Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., voted to stop adding fluoride and  Houston’s city council chose to leave it in. In August,  Port Angeles, Wash., stopped fluoridation until voters decide in November 2017.

Copyright 2016 Health News Florida